Should the City of Cape Town rename a street after FW de Klerk?

If you’re too busy to read the full post, my answer (as per Betteridge’s Law) is “no”.

And, in case you don’t know what I’m talking about at all, the issue is this:

FWFrom today and until the end of October, the public have been invited to participate in the City of Cape Town’s deliberations on whether to rename Table Bay Boulevard in honour of FW – so, it would become FW de Klerk Boulevard.

If you want to read the full request for input, it’s on the City’s “Have your say” website, along with a fillable form. You could also email naming@capetown.gov.za (or submit something by fax, and therefore presumably by carrier pigeon also).

We don’t get to see the full proposal – all we can read by way of motivation is the following:

The proposal for renaming Table Bay Boulevard (the first section of N1 from Cape Town), FW De Klerk Boulevard, is motivated by the role that Mr. De Klerk played in the transition to a new dispensation in South Africa. He is a Nobel Peace Laureate recipient who has not received any recognition for the role he has played in the recent history of South Africa.

“He is a Nobel Peace Laureate who has not received any recognition“? I’m guessing they left something out there, like “not received any recognition in the form of a road being named after him”.

And it’s not just the Nobel that he’s been awarded: there’s the Prix du Courage Internationale, the UNESCO Houphouet-Boigny Prize, the Prince of Asturias Prize, and the Philadelphia Peace Prize.

On top of those (and others I haven’t listed), I’ve found reference to 8 Honorary Doctorates, and then the Order of Mapungubwe (Gold) – South Africa’s highest honour – too. So, it’s really only the City of Cape Town who seem to have forgotten to give this man a token of their appreciation.

Here’s why this Capetonian (me) thinks that they should keep on forgetting to do so, and why I’d encourage you to express your disapproval of the plan too (assuming you do disapprove, of course).

First, an objection in principle: it’s irrational to name things after living people in general, especially when naming and renaming costs money. If you don’t already think FW de Klerk unworthy of having a road named after him, he’s still got time to demonstrate his unworthiness to you.

I have no reason to expect that we’re going to learn unsavoury things about him in his remaining years, but it’s certainly possible – so I’d at least want to wait until his full story has been written, in case we end up naming a road after someone who has been exposed as a [insert something unsavoury here].

And second, because it was always absurd that he was awarded the Nobel alongside Mandela. Sure, the 10%-ish percent of white South Africans had a disproportionate number of guns and Rands, so were perhaps taken more seriously than they might otherwise have been, but any of you who were in South Africa in the late 80’s would know that FW had two choices: blood in the streets, or handing power over.

You don’t get to play at magnanimity if you never deserved to be the boss, and also, it’s no great achievement to do what anyone in your position would have needed to do, in order to avoid further bombings, murders, international ostracisation and the like.

I’d perhaps feel differently about de Klerk if he had a history of being a democrat, and someone committed to a non-racial South Africa. But he was the leader of the National Party in our most conservative Province, the Transvaal, and served a succession of racist white Presidents loyally. As Minister of Education, he supported the continued racial segregation of our universities.

To quote from a Telegraph piece with the unassuming title of “The day I ended apartheid

Black Africans had basically lost nearly all of their human rights over that period [the second half of the 20th century].

Nothing in De Klerk’s Afrikaner background suggested he was about to reverse all that. He had been in the job just four months and was still an unknown quantity, but what was known about him suggested he was no reformer. After a lifetime in the National Party (he was 54), he was generally regarded as on the verkrampte, or unenlightened, side of the party, although he always saw himself around the middle, neither verkrampte or verligte (enlightened), but certainly conservative.

“Negative expectations hinged on the fear that FW, far from being an innovator, was a hidebound disciple of apartheid,” said his own brother, Willem, later. “He never formed any part of the enlightened movement in South Africa. It was even rumoured he had tried to put the brakes on all the reforms PW Botha had made.”

He’s not a great man. He’s a man who was in charge at a great moment in history. It would have made some sense to honour him at the time, as one of those reconciliation gestures South Africans seem to be fond of. But in de Klerk’s case, we’ve done that already, and there’s no constituency (that I’m aware of, at least) that’s clamouring for de Klerk to be given any more medals or prizes.

On the other hand, there are still scores of less celebrated but important South Africans who haven’t yet had a road named after them, never mind being awarded honorary doctorates or Nobel Peace Prizes.

You’d think we’ve simply run out of ideas, in proposing to name a road after de Klerk. But sadly, this might be another indication of Cape Town, the Western Cape, and (by extension) the DA’s obliviousness to aspects of political messaging.

When you’re constantly criticised (often unfairly) for being a racist City, renaming prominent roads offers an opportunity to subtly shift the character and reputation of the City either closer to or further from those perceptions. Why choose the former?

2 Pingbacks/Trackbacks

  • Kevin Charleston

    Thanks Jacques – an excellent question in the last paragraph.

  • Evan

    I think who does the renaming also makes a difference. If it were the ANC proposing it it would be doing so as part of a symbol of reconciliation. It seems very different when it is the DA led city doing it. Let us not forget that the DA is now the home to many former NP members and politicians.

    • Indeed – that’s a good point, thanks.

    • This is true, though I’m fundamentally opposed to the renaming/re-branding fiasco regardless of who comes up with the idea. Even if it is an offensive name. There are more pressing matters, like say ensuring energy security and water security and food security and fixing our education system.

  • Francois Griebenow

    I don’t have a problem with giving FW de Klerk due recognition, but it makes more sense to name roads after geographical features. I do have a problem with Cape Town’s naming policy in general. Look at the names in Parklands, one of the newer neighbourhoods: Salisbury, Peterfield, Chippenham, Dorchester, Avonmouth, Swanley, Horsham, Coatbridge, Hendon, etc. You get the idea. The Council must be on some sort of special dope. This is not England, for crying out loud! How about lovely indigenous names? There are more than enough pronounceable ones.

    • Adrian Frith

      Aren’t the street names in new neighbourhoods mostly chosen by the private developers, not by the city council?

    • Ntate Matata

      Pronounceable by whom?

      • Francois Griebenow

        Google Maps 🙂

  • Wayne Gemmell

    My answer is the same as always, make something new, then decide if you want to name it after him. Renaming current infrastructure is expensive and adds very little value.

  • Calculated

    Hilarious. You can’t be serious. Both Mandela and de Klerk have contributed to a country that is now run by a bunch of mafia.And that is to be praised? SA has no hope with people like them, or the author

  • I would prefer the renaming trend to stop immediately. An engineering friend and I devised a scheme whereby every landmark would have a hexidecimal code that gets issued and that never changes. Then you can rename its common name every couple of years, but the hexidecimal code would remain intact. In this way, the confusion that the renaming caused in Pretoria (if it still is Pretoria, who knows or cares, really?) can be spared the rest of the country. We can free resources to build our future instead of clinging desperately to this imagined past where all the good guys are struggle heroes and never ever terrorists and all the bad guys come in two tone khaki.

  • You can hate, lie and deny as much as you like but if it were not for De Klerk, Max Du Preez, Theuns Eloff, Van Zyl Slabbert, etc etc and 1,924,186 whites who voted YES in 1992 referendum your “new South Africa” would never have existed.

  • Romilia De Andrade

    Was this proposal a result of the public participation process? Even if it was, I agree that renaming Table Bay Boulevard after F W De Klerk is objectionable for the same reasons outlined by Jacques. There is still a Hendrik Verwoerd Drive in Plattekloof. If there is such a strong need to honour De Klerk. why not just rename that F W De Klerk Drive.

  • Pingback: Sparks, Dlamini, and whether “cleverness” is praiseworthy()

  • Pingback: A boulevard named after F.W. de Klerk. Or, do we really need new street names? – Africa is a Country()